Are we really free?
Are we really free?
Published on February 13, 2004 By capt_turk In Politics
Freedom in America?

Americans spout all the platitudes of freedom, and claim to be a free country. But, are we? Our, so called, freedom is more propaganda than anything else. Modern Americans have gotten so complacent, and wish to always be so ultimately safe, that we’ve lain down and taken almost anything that our legislators have wanted to cram down our throats. We have given up all, but faint vestiges, of our rights. In the name of public safety, and for the good of the general public, our freedom has become little more than a good slogan.

Our country was founded on the concept of the individual’s right to personal freedom, the right to live without unnecessary government intrusion in their lives, the right to not have their property taken without due process. I’ve observed, after traveling to many different countries, that the American government is one of the most intrusive, and invasive governments in the world as far as the individual citizen is concerned.

The American government now demands that we get, and forces the citizen to pay for, permission for virtually everything they do.

They intrude in our bedrooms and tell us what we can do, and can’t, within the privacy of our own homes. They tell us who we can marry, and who we can not. They’ve taken away almost all limits to search and seizure of your home, or vehicle, in the name of national security, or in the name of the “War on drugs”. Government agencies can seize your home, business, vehicles, assets, and anything else they want, whether you are guilty of a crime or not. All they have to do is say, they “think” you might be involved in, or have knowledge of, any crime. Have what they think is too much cash on you, and they will take it, even if you can prove it’s legal, and/or came from legal sources. Try to get it back after they seize it? Good luck! Robbery is legal if you are the American government.

We think we can go out and buy a home, and that, we then own it. Nay, all we buy is the right to rent it from our government. Just don’t pay your government demanded rent (taxes), and see how long keep it. It’s gotten to the point, that in most places, you can’t even repair, or improve your home without permission from the government. Get a little slack in the upkeep of your land, and see how long it takes before the minions of government come around and force you bring it back up to the standards that they say it has to maintained to. Try to use your home for anything but a place to eat, sleep, and rest. I guarantee that it won’t be long before you’re ordered to cease and desist, and if you continue, then be ready for big fines, and/or prison. Many places now, you can’t even park your car in the driveway, and that’s another example of something you have to have permission to own, and operate (tags, title, license, and mandatory insurance). More and more, you are now forced to take, and pay for, services that you don’t use, need, or want.

New regulations give police and security agencies the right to spy on you, monitor your phone calls, and email, all in the name of national security. All a cop needs now days, is to say he has suspicions of illegal activities, no proof needed. He can burst into your home, throw you down on the floor and stick a gun to your head. If you resist, and he shoots and kills you, or one of your family, then, “Oh well”, it was just another day in the line of duty. He will probably be rewarded with a day off, with pay no less. The United States has a larger percentage of its population in prison, or jail, than any other country in the world. Shades of Nazi Germany, and the SS, even they didn’t manage to imprison that many people.

Try to buy, or own a firearm. You have to get permission from the government. If you manage to get that permission, don’t even think about trying to carry it, unless you are a cop, and of course, they are the enforcers for the government. Get caught with an unregistered firearm and see how long you keep it, or how long you stay out of jail. The right to own and bear firearms is there to preserve the ability of the citizens to take back an unfair and unjust government. It is not, to go hunting, or necessarily protect your home from intruders. That’s what the government is afraid of. They want to be able to force anything down your throat, and make you take it, without any possibility of resistance. They don’t want you to have the ability to “Just say NO!”, or even to protect your home, family, or person. While I’m there, shoot a burglar, and again, see how long you stay out of jail, or keep your firearm.

Taxation, that’s a real sore point with me. Every day we are taxed more, and more. The citizen is supposed to have a say in how much they are taxed. How long has it been since you had any say in how much you are taxed? Older, and/or, fixed income people are forced to sell their homes everyday, because property taxes have gone so high they can’t pay them. Business taxes have gotten so high, and oppressive regulations, have gotten so intrusive, that small business has become very difficult, to say the least. Between the licenses, user fees, taxes, and compliance with regulations, there is little, if anything, left to justify even being in business. I don’t personally own a business anymore because of it. The only way I could make a profit was to lie about my income, ignore regulations, and leave myself wide open to seizure of everything I have, or even a prison sentence. I don’t, nor have I ever, dealt drugs, or smuggled, or done anything else that’s illegal. I now work for someone else, and how long that lasts is anyone’s guess. The increases in licensing requirements, the increases in fees, and taxes, makes me hope that I die, of other than starvation, before I have to pay out more than I can make. The really sad part is, that I would be making a very good living, if it weren’t for all the money I have to give to the government, or have to spend on compliance with new regulations, just to keep my job. Another example of excessive taxation, without representation, is the tobacco and alcohol taxes. I’ve had occasion to buy both outside of the United States. The average price of a liter of rum, outside the USA is about three to four dollars. The same thing in the US will cost you twenty bucks, or more. The price of a carton of cigarettes is eight to ten dollars in many places outside the USA. In most of the south of the USA, you will pay seventeen, to twenty five dollars. In New York, I just paid seventy seven plus dollars for that same carton. I know the store owners are not setting those prices, or profiting very much from the sale. They only make a few cents on each sale. Five to seven hundred percent taxation is more financial rape, and robbery, than it is fair taxation. I don’t know of a smoker, or drinker, which thinks that’s fair taxation. One of the most well known reasons for declaring our independence from England was unfair taxation. We had a little thing called the Boston Tea Party to show our displeasure with it, and don’t say that that’s alright, only the minority smoke or drink now days, not everyone drank tea back then, either. When will the next thing be determined by the government to be unhealthy, or unsafe, or whatever, and either made altogether illegal, or taxed at an insane level to discourage people from doing it. The legislators seem to have no memory for history. Prohibition didn’t work. All it did, was increase crime. It didn’t stop people from drinking. It just drove up the price, and encouraged people to smuggle, and/or purchase things on the black market. Walking down the street after I bought that carton of cigarettes in New York, I was approached three different times by men offering to sell me cigarettes at half the price of the stores. How much do you want to bet that those offered cigarettes were smuggled from out of state?

I think it’s about time we emulate our ancestors, and have, not a Boston Tea Party, but a New York Tobacco Party. And if that doesn’t get our legislators attention, there’s always that old southern tradition of tarring, feathering, and being ridden out of town on a rail. I recently read a story about a civilization where the death penalty was reserved only for politicians that betrayed the public trust, or tried to take liberties with the rights of the individual. Sounded like a pretty smart civilization to me.

Our legal justice system has become a complete joke. “Guilty until proven rich”, is our motto. If you have the money to play the system, you can usually even get away, even with murder. Recent public trials have proven that fact. If you’re not rich, then you get a “cop out lawyer”, i.e. public defender, and go straight to jail. In my fifty plus years of life, I have yet to even hear of someone that used a public defender that was found innocent, except in cases where sometime later the family of the accused managed to hire an attorney and had the case retried. Every case I’ve ever known of, the person got a big fine, went to jail, or ended up on probation. Public defenders will not spend one minute more on a case than the judge forces them to. Virtually without fail, what happens is, the public defender visits you one time for a few minutes before the trial, and tells you to either plead guilty and take a reduced sentence, or try to prove your innocence and get a whole bunch of time in jail or prison. I’ve had to use one of them myself a couple of times, and I’ve yet to have one even ask me if I was innocent or guilty. They don’t care if someone innocent goes to jail, or has their life ruined. They just want to get it over with, with as little work as possible. As an example, in a recent case where I personally know the defendant, he, knowing he was going to be arrested when the blue lights came on behind him, slowed his vehicle to twenty miles and hour, turned on his flashers, waved to the cop to follow him, drove about four blocks to a friend’s house, and then peacefully surrendered to the cop. He drove the car to the friend’s house hoping to keep it from being impounded. He knew his wife couldn’t afford to get the car out of impound, especially, with him going to jail and not being able to work for awhile. The car was impounded anyway, and his wife lost the car to impound and storage fees. He was the typical blue collar worker that lives from check to check. Not being able to afford bond, or an attorney, he had to take a public defender. Instead of having to just deal with the original charge, now he had a fleeing to elude charge, also. He’s doing five years in jail now on the fleeing charge, because he tried to help his wife. This is justice? Could anyone of intelligence, and common sense, call that fleeing to elude, or justice? This is more an example of mugging the poor, than anything to do with justice. Then we come to the next part of our fine justice system. The probation system. This has become nothing more than a racket to ensure more government jobs, and for the government to make money. I’ve never known of anyone that probation has helped, except to provide jobs for government employees.

Another way that government has intruded in our daily lives is the prohibition on corporal punishment for children. We had only a minor juvenile delinquency problem in this country before the government stepped in and started regulating the way we discipline our children. Oh, of course there were some abuses, and I can see that being stopped, but, it has never harmed a child to spank one. I’m not talking about beating. I ‘m talking about a ritualized discipline such as many teachers used in school, and many parents used at home. You have a standard punishment for most infractions. So many licks with a paddle. A fair metering outs of that discipline, and firmness, in its administration. My personal observations have shown that when government started intervening in child discipline, we lost control of our children. Give a child a well deserved spanking these days and risk having them taken away, and/or being thrown in jail. As a child, my parents used corporal punishment. The thought of raising my voice to my parents, or the thought of striking one of my parents, is so alien to me that I could not even consider it. I was taught respect for my elders, to behave when I was in public. I see parents today living in fear of their own children. I see parents who have absolutely no control over their children’s actions, in private, or in public. I knew that when my parents told me to do, or not, to do something, that they meant it. If I ignored them, I knew I would be punished. It didn’t take many times for me to understand that it was much easier on me, and for them, to do what I was told. That respect for my elders, and “fairly administered” authority, has stayed with me all my life.

Now for another good one. Government services, I must say that I’m glad we don’t get what we pay for in that department. Really though, we are charged more and more for government services that provide less, and less help, and get more, and more intrusive. Remember the old saying? When someone from the government shows up saying they are there to help. Run, run away as fast as you can, because it will only cost you money, and grief, if you take their so called help.

Isn’t it time we had a wake up call in America? Isn’t it time we started demanding, and if necessary, fighting again, for the rights that our ancestors fought so hard to gain? Are we, in our complacency, going to wait till this country has turned into another Nazi Germany, or Afghanistan, controlled by a bunch of power hungry thugs, only interested in power, and controlling other people? I say that we are much nearer to that condition than we realize. The road to that condition is downhill, we are gaining speed, and a totalitarian police state is staring us dead in the face.

Take our guns. Control our every action. Spy on us everywhere we go, take most of what we earn, just to start the list. This is a free country?

I write not as an intellectual. I’m just the average Joe trying to survive. I love our country very much. I wholeheartedly believe in the principals on which this country was founded. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights are more sacred to me than any bible. I fear for our country. The Constitution has been made a sham, the Bill of Rights, a joke. I beg the citizens of this country to make it known that we want our country back, and if our elected officials don’t get it back for us, we will take it back by what ever means are necessary. Write your legislators, vote out the one’s that even think about tampering with our freedom, and our rights. If that doesn’t work, …………. I can only quote one of our forefathers, ”Give me liberty, or give me death”.

With the recent paranoia of our government, I’m sure this editorial will get me put on some government subversive, or terrorist list. I don’t buy into their paranoia, or like what they are doing to our country. I can’t be silent when every day the ideals and principals of our country are ground under foot. Our government has gotten completely out of control. This is no longer a government, for the people, of the people, and by the people. I has become a government, for the government, and by the government, controlled by a handful of rich, self righteous, power hungry individuals that care more about profit, and/or power, over others, than they do about freedom, or the rights of the individual.

Comments (Page 1)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Feb 15, 2004
I agree with the first two paragraphs of you article, but I can't say the same for the rest. I stopped reading about half way through because your opinions are based more on propoganda and less centered around fact than one of President Bush's speeches. What you are calling for is Anarchy, not Democracy. I seriously doubt you have experienced many of the travesies of justice you lament first-hand and don't think you understand the necessity of law and order. Try and think for a few minutes about the possible consequences of living in your world.

Now, to the part of your soap box speech I do agree with. The people of the United States do not react to politics because they feel that the system of democracy is set in place and will never really change. Regardless of whether we have a Democrat, Republican, Liberal or Conservative, our basic rights will remain the same. If you look at countries in Latin America, people are constantly protesting to win freedoms, but as soon as they secure those freedoms and can have faith that they cannot be taken away, the people will back down and let the system work. People respond to situations based on motivational factors, and in the U.S. there is nothing to motivate people to protest to their situation. As a whole, we are well off and do not want to disrupt the relative affluence.

As for rest of your rantings, please, do not generalize a few anecdotes of police brutality or manipulation of the law. You are seeing the world through an even narrower lense than those you are denouncing.
on Feb 15, 2004
I am no political theroist, or any of those other professions that espouse to knowing everything about everything. I can only go by my personal experiences. I've been brutilized by the establishment of this country so many times that I've lost count. I see my friends, family, and aquaintences have similar experiences. In my life time I've lived from the ghetto to relative afluence and back and forth several times. My experience has been that your freedom in this country is in direct relation to how much money you have and/or who you know.
As for calling for anarchy? No, I agree that there should be some limits. Those limits should only involve where your actions cause injury to another. I don't feel that anyone should have, or does have, the right to tell me how to live, as long as I don't cause harm to another. I don't include harming their sensibilities. There are a lot of things other people do that I don't like or care for, but I not about to call for a law to stop them from doing them. I believe in the Wiccan Creed " Do what you will, but do no harm." I feel that should go for everyone, not just myself.
on Feb 15, 2004
I think you clarify your position well with the reply, but your article doesn't really portray you the way your reply does. I do want to argue with you about one point. Do you not think that the right to bear arms puts guns in the hands of people with the intent to harm? You criticize the fact that we have to get permission to own a firearm, but if no one had to get permission how many more people with bad intentions would get firearms and do harm to you?

As for prices and taxation, compared with European countries our taxes and cost of living are low. Granted, it is true that many European countries have efficient and comprehensive healthcare and educational systems, but if people in the U.S. would lose the materialistic mentality and conserve the resources we have we could afford to be taxed more and have better healthcare and education. If you use less developed countries as an example of low prices you are not considering the fact that for the people who live there the prices are not low. It is cheaper for you to buy cigarettes in Bolivia or the Czech Republic because the economies are different and your currency happens to be worth more there. And, do you know why that currency happens to be worth more? It is primarily because your country is the way it is. For the people living there it is more expensive to buy such commodities than it is for you in the U.S.

I like your creed, and it is unfortunate that our laws are designed to promote this ideal but don't seem to always work as they should.
on Feb 15, 2004

The US standard of living is far higher than that fo Europe. Heatlh care in Europe is certainly not better than that int he US. Their education system is no better than ours either.  If it was, then please explain why our productivity, even on a per hour basis, is much higher than Europe's.

Our taxes should be lower, not higher.

on Feb 15, 2004
First of all, I didn't say standard or living, I said cost of living. There is a big difference. It costs more to live there, meaning utilities are higher, housing prices are higher, food, cigarettes, etc. cost more compared to what the average European earns. They also pay a higher percentage of their salary in taxes and receive healthcare and higher education at no additional cost. I guess I should rate these systems on quality. I am simply saying they exist, whereas in the U.S. if you don't have an employer that provides assistance for healthcare you have to pay for it yourself. And forget about a free college education. Even if you go to a state school you have to pay a few thousand a year. This is what I am talking about. Besides, how do you know that we produce more than the European Union, Brad?
on Feb 15, 2004
I will give you one thing, though. The U.S. probably has a higher GDP than the EU. I still don't believe that the U.S. has a better healthcare or education system.
on Feb 15, 2004

Besides, how do you know that we produce more than the European Union, Brad?

Er, because production and productivity rates are a matter of public record.

The United States system of government is predicated on the believe that people are better off with as many options as possible. That tends to allow most people live at a higher standard of living than anywhere else on the world but also causes a small percent of the population to live in poverty and misery.

A more clear cut look at it would be like this: Americans, in general, have chosen to have freedom so that 90% of the population can live really really well but at the cost of 10% being miserably poor.

In Western Europe, they would rather have 99% of the population live reasonably, though not quite as nicely as Americans, but at the same time only have 1% of the population living in misery and poverty.

It's just a different set of values.  And so you always have a battle between those who want to institute programs that would decrease the misery of those who have failed at the cost of having everyone else not live quite as nicely.

There is no "right" or "wrong" in that argument, it's just a matter of priorities.  You will find that I will always argue that rights for individuals to pursue happiness trumps the movement to ensure all of society achieves comfort. The cost is simply too high on the the 90% of society that does succeed to work to make sure that the bottom 10% are living comfortably.

The American system is the win-lose scenario. The European system is the Kind of win-Kind of lose situation.

 

on Feb 15, 2004
Andy - for those of us with insurance (about 90%) the American healthcare system is signficantly better than Europe or Canada. But it comes as a cost - we pay more and some people don't have any insurance.
on Feb 16, 2004
According to the CDC, the percentage of Americans without health insurance is slightly greater than you say. It appears from their statistics that minorities range from about 20% uncovered to 40%. You are right, though, it is a matter of priorities. Most people from the U.S. see the rights of the individual as being more important than the good of all, yet many still take pity on the less fortunate but don't do anything.

There was another issue that seems to have been left behind, education. I prefer to speak about higher education since there is already a public primary and secondary education system in place. Don't you think it would be beneficial to have a "free" university system in place? I will throw out a couple of the cons right away: fewer choices and unmotivated faculty (though we already have that in some instances because of tenure). I think a plan to provide higher education in exchange for service is long overdue in this country. What do you think?

Andy
on Feb 16, 2004
In California, the state used to pay the tuition, but after awhile people felt the students were acting like ungrateful spoiled brats (and probably some other issues, but that's the main one I heard).
on Feb 16, 2004
I think you missed my point, or I didn't state it fully about my bitch with taxes. My problem is with Items that are singled out, and then taxed outrageously, because someone figures that its bad for you, or they don't like it, or whatever. I believe our general tax rates are excessive. From what I've read of economic anylyists of history, any country who has exceeded 25% of a persons income in taxes has grown far too top heavy and is failing. Rome was one example. The British Empire is another. As soon as their tax rate exceeded, aprox.,25%, they started going into decline.
As far as healthcare goes. I'm one of those people who mostly can't afford health insurance. One of the reasons it costs so much is the gouge prices of hospitals. I don't think anyone can argue with that! A personal example: My job requires me to get reqular drug screens. The place I normally go, charges $50.00 for it. I had a incident happen recently that required me to get a drug screen on a Saturday night. Because my regular sources were closed, I had to go to a hospital emergency room for the drug screen. By the time all was said and done, they had presented me with a bill for almost $1200.00. And by the way, I was only there for about an hour. Most of it spent sitting in the waiting room. A hundred and twenty five dollars of that bill was from the doctor on call that brought me a cup of coffee and asked me how I was doing. That's the most expensive cup of coffee I ever had. And I thought airport prices were high!
on Feb 16, 2004
In California, the state used to pay the tuition, but after awhile people felt the students were acting like ungrateful spoiled brats


Actually, in California the state passed a tax measure which drastically cut property taxes, the usual number one supplier for schools of all kinds. It didn't matter at the time because California had huge surpluses and they could continue to pay for education, for awhile, the money since ran out and California's schools went from being some of the best, to some of the worst.

Cheers
on Feb 16, 2004
The gun issue? Granted, everyone having free access to firearms has it's problems. The citizens of this country are supposed to have the right to own and bear firearms. That right is not so you you can rob your neighbor, or protect your family from a robber. That right is there so that the citizens of this country retain the capability to take back an unfair and unjust government. Anyone who is a convicted felon looses that right. Any felon caught with, or that uses a firearm to commit a crime should be dealt with very harshly. In fact, our laws, when they work, do just that. A by product of most people owning, and knowing how to use firearms is a drop in the crime rate. People are much more courteous, more careful about what they say and do to others when they know the other person has the ability to defend themselves. In reaction to one of the gun control flurries in recent years, a town in Georgia passed a regulation requiring all heads of household to own, possess, and know how to use a firearm. The crime rate in that town dropped like a stone. Switzerland requires all adult male citizens to receive fire arms training and to own and maintain a firearm. They have one of the lowest crime rates in the world.
But I degress. The whole point is to keep the government afraid of going overboard, and to take it back if it does.
on Feb 16, 2004
Another guick statement: With freedom comes responibility, and freedom is not safe. I personally would rather risk having to deal with a criminal, and be free, than be safe and have everything I do controlled and regulated.
on Feb 16, 2004
"With freedom comes responibility, and freedom is not safe. I personally would rather risk having to deal with a criminal, and be free, than be safe and have everything I do controlled and regulated."

America was founded on and is still fueled by the free enterprise system. We have the right to have ownership; and with that, the right to compete and succeed, freedom. But as you say, freedom is not safe. Along with the right to own is the ability to lose; and though I have the opportunity to compete and succeed, there is a chance I can fail. But anybody who has succeeded in anything in life can agree that, "All success is predecated and built upon, failure." But some people don't like that part. I don't. Who enjoys falling on their butt? No stright forward, right thinking human being I know of. That doesn't change the turth of it. But I like the way C.S. Lewis puts it, although he is talking about God and not freedom specifically:

"Safe? Who said anything about safe? 'Course he isn't safe. But he's good."
3 Pages1 2 3